Search for: All records

Understanding microbial interactions is fundamental for exploring population dynamics, particularly in microbial communities where interactions affect stability and host health. Generalized Lotka-Volterra (gLV) models have been widely used to investigate system dynamics but depend on absolute abundance data, which are often unavailable in microbiome studies. To address this limitation, we introduce an iterative Lotka-Volterra (iLV) model, a novel framework tailored for compositional data that leverages relative abundances and iterative refinements for parameter estimation. The iLV model features two key innovations: an adaptation of the gLV framework to compositional constraints and an iterative optimization strategy combining linear approximations with nonlinear refinements to enhance parameter estimation accuracy. Using simulations and real-world datasets, we demonstrate that iLV surpasses existing methodologies, such as the compositional LV (cLV) and the generalized LV (gLV) model, in recovering interaction coefficients and predicting species trajectories under varying noise levels and temporal resolutions. Applications to the lynx-hare predator-prey,Stylonychia pustula-P. caudatummixed culture, and cheese microbial systems revealed consistency between predicted and observed relative abundances showcasing its accuracy and robustness. In summary, the iLV model bridges theoretical gLV models and practical compositional data analysis, offering a robust framework to infer microbial interactions and predict community dynamics using relative abundance data, with significant potential for advancing microbial research. 

We present TIPP3 and TIPP3-fast, new tools for abundance profiling in metagenomic datasets. Like its predecessor, TIPP2, the TIPP3 pipeline uses a maximum likelihood approach to place reads into labeled taxonomies using marker genes, but it achieves superior accuracy to TIPP2 by enabling the use of much larger taxonomies through improved algorithmic techniques. We show that TIPP3 is generally more accurate than leading methods for abundance profiling in two important contexts: when reads come from genomes not already in a public database (i.e., novel genomes) and when reads contain sequencing errors. We also show that TIPP3-fast has slightly lower accuracy than TIPP3, but is also generally more accurate than other leading methods and uses a small fraction of TIPP3’s runtime. Additionally, we highlight the potential benefits of restricting abundance profiling methods to those reads that map to marker genes (i.e., using a filtered marker-gene based analysis), which we show typically improves accuracy. TIPP3 is freely available athttps://github.com/c5shen/TIPP3.